Mcleans Creek
Mcleans Creek
Took a drive out to see how the snow melt was coming along and there were a ton of movie trailers out there, old cars with South Dakota license plates (gremlin). Anyone know what's going on?
Re: Mcleans Creek
I've heard rumours about a sequel to Fargo. Perhaps this is it?
----------------->just some guy<-----------------
- erniebearskin
- Columnist
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 10:20 am
Re: Mcleans Creek
The new Fargo is a tv series I thought I heard, but they are filming it in the Calgary area.
Re: Mcleans Creek
Yes it is a TV series, and yes they were filming in Calgary this could be it.
the company I work for rented some equipment to Fargo corporation for their show
the company I work for rented some equipment to Fargo corporation for their show
Re: Mcleans Creek
NoPlan wrote:Yes it is a TV series, and yes they were filming in Calgary this could be it.
the company I work for rented some equipment to Fargo corporation for their show
Yup, I know a girl who works on the sets and was out at Mclean.
Said the conservation officer was a real D***. Haha.
Not slamming the CO's. I know they have their fair share of battles but hassling a film crew for what appeared to be ridiculous reasons is beyond me.
Re: Mcleans Creek
The CO's have to be sure the TV people have the proper permissions and permits to be there and aren't just out there closing down public roads without permits, signs, tearing up roads, leaving a mess, etc.
TV people can be just as big d***s. They often try to get by without getting permissions to shoot on the basis that is "only for a few hours" and "there isn't anyone around to complain" just to save the time it takes to go through the proper channels and do things right.
I'll side with the CO's any day.
TV people can be just as big d***s. They often try to get by without getting permissions to shoot on the basis that is "only for a few hours" and "there isn't anyone around to complain" just to save the time it takes to go through the proper channels and do things right.
I'll side with the CO's any day.
The voices are back. Awesome!
Re: Mcleans Creek
It was more in regards to stringent control of them using a small section of a very wide trail.
I'm sure there are two sides to the storey.
I'm sure there are two sides to the storey.
Re: Mcleans Creek
The CO's get a bad wrap for doing their jobs. Everyone says that they are hassling people when they are stopped and checked for license, registration, TFA's, shooting guns at trail heads, burning cars in a field, etc. The truth is if they weren't out there "hassling" people, then people and businesses, including TV crews, would just be out running around doing whatever they feel like doing. This time it may have been a small section of a very wide trail, but it could just as easily have been the entire trail. There is no way for the CO to know what they plan to do and TV crews are famous for changing their minds on site.
In defence of the CO's, consider this; the next time you see a quad poaching our singletrack, think about how nice it would be to have that CO around being a hassle.
Sorry if this sounds hostile, that isn't my intention. All the same, picking on the CO's for trying to protect our playground strikes a nerve with me.
In defence of the CO's, consider this; the next time you see a quad poaching our singletrack, think about how nice it would be to have that CO around being a hassle.
Sorry if this sounds hostile, that isn't my intention. All the same, picking on the CO's for trying to protect our playground strikes a nerve with me.
The voices are back. Awesome!
Re: Mcleans Creek
Where's the "Like" button....
Brass wrote:The CO's get a bad wrap for doing their jobs. Everyone says that they are hassling people when they are stopped and checked for license, registration, TFA's, shooting guns at trail heads, burning cars in a field, etc. The truth is if they weren't out there "hassling" people, then people and businesses, including TV crews, would just be out running around doing whatever they feel like doing. This time it may have been a small section of a very wide trail, but it could just as easily have been the entire trail. There is no way for the CO to know what they plan to do and TV crews are famous for changing their minds on site.
In defence of the CO's, consider this; the next time you see a quad poaching our singletrack, think about how nice it would be to have that CO around being a hassle.
Sorry if this sounds hostile, that isn't my intention. All the same, picking on the CO's for trying to protect our playground strikes a nerve with me.